Real-life evidence about the use of intravenous brivaracetam in urgent seizures: The BRIV-IV study.

PURPOSE: Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice. METHODS: BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam. CONCLUSION: IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of cenobamate in patients with focal onset seizures: Outcomes from an Expanded Access Program.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated early, real-world outcomes with cenobamate (CNB) in a large series of patients with highly drug-resistant epilepsy within a Spanish Expanded Access Program (EAP). METHOD: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study in 14 hospitals. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, focal seizures, and EAP authorization. Data were sourced from patient clinical records. Primary effectiveness endpoints included reductions (100%, ≥90%, ≥75%, and ≥50%) or worsening in seizure frequency at 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits and at the last visit. Safety endpoints included rates of adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: The study included 170 patients. At baseline, median epilepsy duration was 26 years and median number of seizures/month was 11.3. The median number of prior antiseizure medications (ASMs) and concomitant ASMs were 12 and 3, respectively. Mean CNB dosages/day were 176 mg, 200 mg, and 250 mg at 3, 6, and 12 months. Retention rates were 98.2%, 94.5%, and 87% at 3, 6, and 12 months. At last available visit, the rate of seizure freedom was 13.3%; ≥90%, ≥75%, and ≥50% responder rates were 27.9%, 45.5%, and 63%, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the number of seizures per month (mean: 44.6%; median: 66.7%) between baseline and the last visit (P < 0.001). Responses were maintained regardless of the number of prior or concomitant ASMs. The number of concomitant ASMs was reduced in 44.7% of patients. The cumulative percentage of patients with AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were 68.2% and 3.5% at 3 months, 74.1% and 4.1% at 6 months, and 74.1% and 4.1% at 12 months. The most frequent AEs were somnolence and dizziness. SIGNIFICANCE: In this highly refractory population, CNB showed a high response regardless of prior and concomitant ASMs. AEs were frequent but mostly mild-to-moderate, and few led to discontinuation.

Perampanel outcomes at different stages of treatment in people with focal and generalized epilepsy treated in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study.

Introduction: The PERMIT study is the largest pooled analysis of perampanel (PER) clinical practice data conducted to date. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of PERMIT investigated the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of PER when used as early add-on therapy (after failure of one or two previous antiseizure medications) in comparison with late add-on therapy (after failure of three or more previous antiseizure medications). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness was assessed by seizure type (total seizures, focal seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCS]) and assessments included seizure freedom rate and responder rate. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. Results: The Full Analysis Set included 1184 and 2861 PWE treated with PER as early and late add-on therapy, respectively. Compared to the late add-on subgroup, the early add-on subgroup was characterized by later mean age at epilepsy onset, shorter mean duration of epilepsy, lower rates of intellectual disability and psychiatric comorbidity, and lower frequency of seizures per month, suggesting a less severe form of epilepsy in this subgroup. After 12 months, retention was significantly higher in the early versus late add-on subgroup (67.7% vs. 62.4%; p = 0.004). At the last visit, responder rates in the early versus late add-on subgroup were significantly higher for total seizures (68.2% vs. 39.3%; p < 0.001), focal seizures (65.0% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.001) and GTCS (83.7% vs. 67.2%; p < 0.001), as were seizure freedom rates (total seizures, 35.9% vs. 11.9% [p < 0.001]; focal seizures, 29.4% vs. 8.7% [p < 0.001]; GTCS, 69.0% vs. 48.1% [p < 0.001]). Incidence of AEs was significantly lower in the early versus late add-on subgroup (42.1% vs. 54.7%; p < 0.001), as was the rate of discontinuation due to AEs over 12 months (15.0% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.031). Discussion: This study demonstrated that PER was effective and generally well tolerated when initiated as early or late add-on therapy, but it was significantly more effective and better tolerated when initiated early. These findings support PER's use as a broad-spectrum, early add-on therapy for use in PWE with focal and generalized seizures.

Relationship between sleep quality and cognitive performance in patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between self-reported sleep quality and cognitive function in patients with epilepsy (PWE), as well as anxiety and depressive symptoms and patient quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional study included PWE aged ≥12 years who were receiving ≥1 anti-seizure medication (ASM) and had not been diagnosed with a sleep disorder. Patients completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-10 (QOLIE-10). RESULTS: The study enrolled 150 patients aged 16-83 years, mean age (standard deviation [SD]) 40.6 (15.2) years; 58.7% were female and 75.3% had focal epilepsy. Mean (SD) PSQI score was 4.71 (3.08), 44.4% of patients had impaired sleep quality (PSQI score ≥5), 19.9% had pathologic excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS score >12), and 32.7% had mild cognitive impairment (MoCA score <26). Within the PSQI, sleep disturbance (P = 0.036) and use of sleep medication (P = 0.006) scores were significantly higher in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Multiple regression analysis showed older age (regression coefficient [B], -0.086; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.127, -0.045; P < 0.001) and the use of sleep medication component of the PSQI [B, -1.157; 95% CI, -2.064, -0.220; P = 0.013) were independently associated with lower MoCA score. Poor sleep quality was associated with probable anxiety and depression symptoms, and directly correlated with reduced QoL. CONCLUSIONS: In PWE, sleep quality was not significantly independently associated with mild cognitive impairment, although poor sleep quality had a negative effect on mood and QoL.

Iron Deposits in Periaqueductal Gray Matter Are Associated with Poor Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine.

Previous studies have reported increased brain deposits of iron in patients with chronic migraine (CM). This study aims to determine the relation between iron deposits and outcome after treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA). Demographic and clinical data were collected for this study through a prospective cohort study including 62 CM patients treated with OnabotA in the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Demographic and clinical variables were registered. Selected biomarkers in plasma during interictal periods (calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pentraxin-3 (PTX3)) and neuroimaging changes (iron deposits in the red nucleus (RN), substantia nigra (SN), globus pallidus (GP), and periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), and white matter lesions (WML)) were determined. Subjects were classified in responders (≥50% reduction in headache days) or non-responders (<50%). Responders to treatment were younger (mean age difference = 12.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.4-18.9, p = 0.001), showed higher serum levels of CGRP (≥50 ng/mL) and PTX3 (≥1000 pg/mL) and smaller iron deposits in the GP and PAG (mean difference = 805.0; 95% CI: 37.9-1572.1 µL, p = 0.040 and mean difference = 69.8; 95% CI: 31.0-108.6 µL, p = 0.008; respectively). Differences in PAG iron deposits remained significant after adjusting for age (mean difference = 65.7; 95% CI: 22.8-108.6 µL, p = 0.003) and were associated with poor response to OnabotA after adjustment for clinical and biochemical variables (odds ratio (OR) = 0.963; 95% CI: 0.927-0.997, p = 0.041). We conclude that larger PAG iron deposits are associated with poor response to OnabotA in CM.

Pentraxin 3 (PTX3): A Molecular Marker of Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Migraine.

Even though endothelial dysfunction is known to play a role in migraine pathophysiology, studies regarding levels of endothelial biomarkers in migraine have controversial results. Our aim was to evaluate the role of pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and soluble tumour necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK) as potential biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in chronic migraine (CM). We performed a case-control study including 102 CM patients and 28 control subjects and measured serum levels of markers of endothelial dysfunction (PTX3 and sTWEAK) and inflammation [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] as well as brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) during interictal periods. Interictal serum levels of PTX3 and sTWEAK were higher in CM patients than in controls (1350.6 ± 54.8 versus 476.1 ± 49.4 pg/mL, p < 0.001 and 255.7 ± 21.1 versus 26.4 ± 2.6 pg/mL, p < 0.0001; respectively). FMD was diminished in CM patients compared to controls (9.6 ± 0.6 versus 15.2 ± 0.9%, p < 0.001). Both PTX3 and sTWEAK were negatively correlated with FMD (r = -0.508, p < 0.001 and r = -0.188, p = 0.033; respectively). After adjustment of confounders, PTX3 remained significantly correlated to FMD (r = -0.250, p = 0.013). Diagnosis of CM was 68.4 times more likely in an individual with levels of PTX3 ≥ 832.5 pg/mL, suggesting that PTX3 could be a novel biomarker of endothelial dysfunction in CM.

Use of intravenous brivaracetam in status epilepticus: A multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam (BRV), added to its effectiveness observed in animal models of status epilepticus (SE), makes this drug attractive for use in emergency situations. Our objective was to evaluate the use of intravenous BRV in a multicenter study. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter registry of SE cases treated with BRV was created. These patients were evaluated between January and December 2018 at seven hospitals in Spain. Demographic variables, SE characteristics, concomitant drugs, loading doses, and response to treatment were collected. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were registered. The mean age was 56 ± 23.1 years, 51.2% were male, 29 had previous epilepsy, 24 (55.8%) had prominent motor symptoms, and 19 had nonconvulsive symptoms. Regarding the etiology, 19 (44.2%) were considered acute symptomatic, 16 (17.2%) remote symptomatic, four (9.3%) progressive symptomatic, and four (9.3%) cryptogenic. Regarding concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), 17 had previously received levetiracetam (LEV). In 14 patients, BRV was used early (first or second AED). The median loading dose was 100 mg (range = 50-400), and the weight-adjusted dose was 1.8 mg/kg (range = 0.4-7.3). BRV was effective in 54% (n = 23), and a response was observed in <6 hours in 13 patients. We observed a tendency for it to be more effective when administered earlier (P = 0.09), but there were no differences regarding SE type and the concomitant use of LEV. In those with the fastest responses, we observed that both the total administered dose (300 mg vs 100 mg, P = 0.008) and the weight-adjusted dose (3.85 mg vs 1.43 mg, P = 0.006) were significantly higher. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the best cutoff point for a faster response was 1.82 mg/kg. SIGNIFICANCE: BRV is useful for the treatment of SE, even when patients are already being treated with LEV. The response rate seems higher when it is administered earlier and at higher doses (>1.82 mg/kg).

MONOZEB: Long-term observational study of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy.

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) when used as monotherapy for 1 year or more in routine clinical use in patients with focal seizures in epilepsy clinics in Spain. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, noninterventional study. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had focal seizures, and started on ESL ≥1 year before database closure. Primary endpoint was the following: proportion seizure-free for ≥6 months at 1 and 2 years. Secondary endpoints included retention on ESL monotherapy at 1 and 2 years, seizure frequency change, seizure worsening, and side effects. Other analyses included seizure freedom from baseline to 1 and 2 years and outcomes in special populations. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-five patients were included (127 on first-line monotherapy and 308 converting to ESL monotherapy): median daily dose was 800 mg at all time points; 63.2% were seizure-free at 1 year, 65.1% at 2 years, and 50.3% for the entire follow-up. Mean duration of ESL monotherapy was 66.7 months; retention was 88.0% at 1 year and 81.9% at 2 years. Mean reduction in seizure frequency was 75.5% at last visit. Over the entire follow-up, seizure worsening was seen in 22 patients (5.1%), side effects in 28.0%, considered severe in 1.8%, and leading to discontinuation in 5.7%. Dizziness, hyponatremia (sodium <135 mEq/l), and somnolence were the most frequent side effects. Outcomes in special populations (patients aged ≥65 years and those with psychiatric history or learning difficulty) were consistent with the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with focal seizures taking ESL monotherapy had excellent retention, high seizure-free rates, and good tolerability up to 2 years.

Levels of anger in epilepsy patients treated with eslicarbazepine acetate.

INTRODUCTION: Aggressive behavior is commonly associated with epilepsy and can be influenced by the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) taken. Sodium channel blockers, specifically the carboxamides derivatives such as carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, are some of the AEDs considered to have a favorable psychiatric effect profile. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether the carboxamide analogue eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) has any effect on the levels of anger in patients with epilepsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively recruited adult patients with epilepsy on treatment with ≦2 active AEDs, who required AED addition or substitution, excluding patients with active psychiatric disorders. All patients completed anger level (STAXI-2), depression-anxiety (HADS), and quality of life (QOLIE-10) assessments, and were evaluated at baseline and within 3-6 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Of 78 patients receiving ESL, as add-on therapy or in substitution of a previous AED, were recruited into the ESL group, with an average age of 48 years and 54% men. We used a control group of 58 patients receiving AEDs other than carboxamides. CONCLUSIONS: Patients overall showed improvements in anger levels, mood, and quality of life during the follow-up. A history of psychiatric disorders was a limiting factor to improve anger levels. As compared to controls, anger levels improved in ESL patients independently from seizure control. Therefore, ESL seems to exert a favorable influence on the anger levels of otherwise healthy patients with epilepsy, including those unresponsive to seizure control. The potential ESL anti-aggressive effect should be studied in patients with epilepsy and active psychiatric disorders.

Iron deposition in periaqueductal gray matter as a potential biomarker for chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To study iron deposition in red nucleus (RN), globus pallidus (GP), and periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) as a potential biomarker of chronic migraine (CM) and its association with levels of biomarkers related to migraine pathophysiology. METHODS: This case-control study included 112 patients with migraine (55 CM, 57 episodic migraine [EM]) and 25 headache-free controls. We analyzed iron deposition using 3T MRI and the NIH software platform ImageJ; we analyzed serum levels of markers of inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption by ELISA in peripheral blood during interictal periods. RESULTS: Patients with CM showed larger iron grounds volume in RN compared to patients with EM (70.2 ± 6.8 vs 25.5 ± 7.3 µL, p < 0.001) and controls (70.2 ± 6.8 vs 15.1 ± 10.8 µL, p < 0.001), as well as larger iron deposits in PAG compared to patients with EM (360.3 ± 6.5 vs 249.7 ± 6.9 µL, p < 0.001) and controls (360.3 ± 6.5 vs 168.6 ± 10.3 µL, p < 0.001). In PAG, differences were also significant between patients with EM and controls. No significant differences were obtained for GP. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the optimal threshold for iron volume was 15 µL in RN (80% sensitivity, 71% specificity) and 240 µL in PAG (93% sensitivity, 97% specificity). Iron grounds volume in PAG was correlated with higher plasma levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor-like WEAK (r = 0.395, p = 0.005) and cellular fibronectin (r = 0.294, p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CM showed increased iron deposition in RN and PAG compared to patients with EM and controls. Iron grounds volume in PAG identified correctly patients with CM and was associated with elevated biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and BBB disruption.

LACONORTE study: Efficacy and security of lacosamide as first add-on therapy for focal-onset epilepsy in real-life setting.

RATIONALE: Many patients with epilepsy need a second antiepileptic drug (AED), due either to inefficacy or side effects of the first tried one. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (LCM) as first add-on therapy in the real-life setting. METHODS: LACONORTE is a multicenter, retrospective, one-year study. Patients with focal epilepsy on monotherapy with another AED who were started on lacosamide as first add-on therapy were included. Clinical data was obtained at 3, 6 and 12 months and then analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (48.6% men) with a mean age of 50.3 and a median duration of the epilepsy of 3.0 years (range 0-65) were included. At 1 year, 91.8% were responders (with at least 50% reduction in the number of seizures) and 64.4% of all patients and 75.8% of those with secondary generalization were seizure-free. Fifteen patients (20.5%) had adverse events (AE), most of them were transient and no severe AEs were reported. LCM was withdrawn in 2 patients due to intolerance and in 1 patient because of inefficacy. Neither side effects nor withdrawal seemed to be related to total dose or to escalating regimes. Seventy patients (95.9%) continued on LCM after the last visit (median dose 200 mg/day, ranging 100-400). Eighteen (24.7%) converted to monotherapy during the 12-month period, 83.3% of them remaining seizure-free. CONCLUSIONS: These results of real-life setting show LCM to be efficacious and safe when used as first add-on therapy for focal-onset epilepsy. Most adverse events were mild and/or transient.

Hemisferectomía funcional: seguimiento a largo plazo en una serie de cinco casos / Functional hemispherectomy: long-term follow-up in a series of five patients

Introducción. La hemisferectomía funcional es una de las técnicas quirúrgicas con intención paliativa que se pueden realizar en pacientes con epilepsia farmacorresistente y síndromes hemisféricos. Se basa en la desconexión neuronal del hemisferio afectado preservando el árbol vascular. Objetivo. Analizar el pronóstico y la seguridad a largo plazo de las hemisferectomías realizadas en nuestro centro. Pacientes y métodos. Revisión retrospectiva de los casos intervenidos, recogiendo las siguientes variables clínicas: edad, sexo, edad de inicio de la epilepsia, tipo de crisis, etiología de la epilepsia, edad de intervención, pronóstico posquirúrgico y posibles complicaciones. El seguimiento mínimo fue de cinco años. Resultados. Cinco pacientes (60% mujeres) fueron intervenidos entre 1999 y 2010. La edad de inicio de la epilepsia fue de 36 meses, y el tiempo de evolución hasta la cirugía, de 7 años. El tipo de crisis más habitual fueron las crisis parciales simples motoras con generalización secundaria (n = 5). Tres pacientes permanecieron libres de crisis tras la cirugía, y otro paciente mejoró más de un 90%. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 13 años. Como complicaciones, una paciente sufrió una meningitis bacteriana sin secuelas posteriores. A los seis años de la cirugía, un paciente presentó una hidrocefalia que requirió la implantación de una válvula de derivación ventriculoperitoneal. Conclusiones. La hemisferectomía funcional constituye un procedimiento quirúrgico eficaz para el tratamiento de pacientes con epilepsia farmacorresistente, patología hemisférica extensa y crisis limitadas a ese hemisferio. Hay complicaciones que pueden aparecer tardíamente, por lo que se aconseja un seguimiento a largo plazo de estos pacientes (AU)

Introduction. Functional hemispherectomy consists in palliative epilepsy surgical procedure usually performed in patients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy and hemispheric syndromes. It is based on the neural disconnection of the affected hemisphere with preservation of the vascular supply. Aim. To analyze long-term prognosis and safety of the hemispherectomies performed in our institution. Patients and methods. Retrospective analysis collecting the following variables: age, gender, age of epilepsy onset, type of seizures, etiology, age of epilepsy surgery, prognosis and potential surgical complications. All patients had a minimum of five years of follow up. Results. Five patients (60% females) underwent hemispherotomy between 1999 and 2010. Age of epilepsy onset was 36 months and time of evolution until surgery was 7 years. The most frequent type of seizures were simple motor seizures with secondary generalization (n = 5). Three patients remained seizure free persistently after surgery and another patient had a more than 90% improvement. Time of follow up was 13 years. One patient suffered a bacterial meningitis without sequelae. Six years after surgery a patient suffered hydrocephalous requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Conclusions. Functional hemispherectomy constitutes an effective method to treat patients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy, extensive unihemispheric pathology and seizures limited to that hemisphere. Late complications may occur thus long-term follow-up is needed (AU)

CGRP and PTX3 as Predictors of Efficacy of Onabotulinumtoxin Type A in Chronic Migraine: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to find a relation between several biomarkers in peripheral blood and outcome after treatment with onabotulinumtoxin A (OnabotA). BACKGROUND: OnabotA is an effective treatment in chronic migraine (CM). Different studies have tried to find predictors of response to treatment, either with clinical characteristics, neuroimaging features, or molecular biomarkers; however, it is still not possible to predict the individual outcome. METHODS: We measured serum levels of biomarkers of inflammation (IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and hs-CRP), endothelial dysfunction (PTX3 and sTWEAK), blood-brain barrier disruption (cFN), brain damage (S100b, NSE), and trigemino-vascular activation (CGRP) by ELISA in a group of CM patients treated with OnabotA and healthy controls. After 24 weeks, patients were classified in two groups according to their outcome considering variations in headache frequency: nonresponders (nonimprovement or improvement <50%) and responders (improvement >50%). We compared baseline levels of biomarkers between these groups. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients diagnosed with CM (IHS 2013 criteria) who fulfilled criteria for treatment with OnabotA and 24 healthy controls were included. Fifteen patients did not respond to treatment (24.2%) and 47 were responders (75.8%). Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) serum levels (1455.4 ± 487.5 pg/mL versus 720.3 ± 334.1 pg/mL, P < .0001) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) serum levels (133.1 ± 86.6 ng/mL versus 58.2 ± 91.7 ng/mL, P = .004) were significantly higher in responders than nonresponders. Serum basal levels of PTX3 >1000 pg/mL (AUC 0.908; 95% CI: 0.827-0.990) and CGRP >50 ng/mL (AUC 0.800; 95% CI: 0.652-0.947) were associated with good response to OnabotA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that molecular markers of trigeminovascular activation (CGRP) and endothelial dysfunction (PTX3) are associated with response to OnabotA and may act as new biomarkers for the selection of treatment in chronic migraineurs.

Role of adipocytokines in the pathophysiology of migraine: A cross-sectional study.

Background Obesity is a risk factor for migraine and headache chronification. Adipocytokines may be involved in this correlation. Objective To relate serum adipocytokine levels to clinical and biochemical parameters associated with migraine. Methods We measured levels of leptin, adiponectin and other inflammatory (interleukin 6, interleukin 10, tumor necrosis factor α, high sensitivity C-reactive protein) and endothelial (pentraxin 3, soluble TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis) molecules potentially related to migraine pathophysiology in a group of migraine patients (IHS 2013) and healthy controls. Results One hundred and eleven patients (mean age 39.7 years, 93% female) and 24 healthy controls (mean age 35.9 years, 90% female) were included. Fifty-six patients were diagnosed with episodic migraine (mean age 35.1 years, 98.2% female) and 55 patients with chronic migraine (mean age 44.4 years, 89.5% female). Leptin serum levels (15.2 ng/mL, SD = 10.5 vs . 3.1 ng/mL, SD = 0.9; p < 0.001) and adiponectin serum levels (72.3 µg/mL, SD = 38.5 vs . 37.7 µg/mL, SD = 16.9; p < 0.001) were significantly increased in migraine patients. Leptin serum levels (15.5 ng/mL, SD = 9.7 vs . 10.8 ng/mL, SD = 6.0; p < 0.001) and adiponectin serum levels (65.8 µg/mL, SD = 42.9 vs . 33.2 µg/mL, SD = 31.0; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in chronic compared to episodic migraine patients. We found a positive correlation between leptin levels and inflammatory biomarkers: IL6 (r = 0.498; p < 0.001), TNF-α (r = 0.389; p < 0.001), and hs-CRP (r = 0.422; p < 0.001). Conclusions Leptin and adiponectin are increased in migraineurs. There is a correlation between adipocytokine levels and other inflammation-related molecules. This suggests a potential role of adipocytokines in migraine pathophysiology and chronification.

NEOPLASM study: Real-life use of lacosamide in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The choice of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is complicated, and there are a lack of robust clinical trial data to date. METHODS: The NEOPLASM (Neuroncologic Patients treated with LAcoSaMide) study was a 6-month, multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients with BTRE treated with lacosamide. Patients were started on lacosamide because of a lack of efficacy or adverse events (AEs) with prior AEDs or suitability versus other AEDs, according to clinical practice. The primary efficacy variable was the seizure-free rate at 6months. Safety variables included the proportion of patients with an AE and the proportion with an AE that led to discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients from 14 hospital centers were included in the analysis. Treatment with lacosamide for 6months resulted in a 30.8% seizure-free rate, and 66.3% of patients had a ≥50% seizure reduction (responders). In the subset of patients included because of a lack of efficacy with prior AEDs, seizure-free rates were 28.0%, and 66.7% of patients were responders. No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed according to the mechanism of action or enzyme-inducing properties of concomitant AEDs. Adverse events were reported by 41.9% of patients at 6months, and 4.7% of them led to discontinuation. The most common AEs were somnolence/fatigue and dizziness. Notably, 57.1% of the patients who were switched to lacosamide because of AEs with their previous therapy did not report any AE at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label, observational study, lacosamide appeared to be effective and well tolerated in a large population of patients with BTRE. Lacosamide may therefore be a promising option for the treatment of patients with BTRE.

Dolor abdominal: una manifestación infrecuente de epilepsia temporal / Abdominal pain: an infrequent manifestation of temporal epilepsy

No disponible

[Clinical experience with lacosamide in Galicia: the GALACO study]. / Experiencia clinica con lacosamida en Galicia: estudio GALACO.

INTRODUCTION: Lacosamide is a sodium channel blocker antiepileptic drug authorized as an adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adolescents and adults. AIM: To analyze the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in Galicia according to its use in daily clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in patients who started treatment with lacosamide between January 2014 and June 2013 in 10 hospitals in Galicia, Spain. Its efficacy and safety at 3, 6 and 12 months after starting lacosamide was assessed. RESULTS: We included 184 patients with a mean age of 44.2 ± 17.4 years old; 56.5% (n = 104) were male; 173 patients constituted the efficacy population. Mean duration of epilepsy was 18.8 ± 15.5 years. Seizure frequency was 2.5 ± 1.6 episodes/month. After 12 months, 68.2% of patients (n = 118) had >= 50% improvement (responders) and among them, 54 (45.8% of responder patients) were seizure free. Twenty-three percent (n = 43) suffered from adverse events after 12 months, being dizziness (10.3%) and instability (3.3%) the most frequently reported. After the 12 month visit, 87.5% of patients (n = 161) continued treatment with lacosamide. CONCLUSIONS: Lacosamide provides a very good efficacy and safety profile for patients with focal refractory epilepsy. High percentage of responders may be related to a less refractory population compared to other daily clinical practice studies. It constitutes an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of focal epilepsies.

TITLE: Experiencia clinica con lacosamida en Galicia: estudio GALACO.Introducción. La lacosamida es un fármaco antiepiléptico bloqueante de los canales de sodio, autorizado en adolescentes y adultos como tratamiento coadyuvante en crisis de inicio focal. Objetivo. Analizar los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de la lacosamida en Galicia en su uso de acuerdo con la práctica clínica habitual. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo observacional en pacientes que iniciaron tratamiento con lacosamida entre enero de 2013 y junio de 2014 en 10 hospitales de Galicia. Se evaluó su eficacia y seguridad a los 3, 6 y 12 meses del inicio del tratamiento. Resultados. Se incluyeron 184 pacientes con edad media de 44,2 ± 17,4 años; el 56,5% (n = 104) eran varones. Conforman la población de eficacia 173 pacientes. El tiempo medio de evolución de la epilepsia fue de 18,8 ± 15,5 años. La frecuencia de crisis era de 2,5 ± 1,6 episodios/mes. A los 12 meses, el 68,2% de los pacientes (n = 118) presentaba una mejoría igual o superior al 50% (pacientes respondedores) y, de ellos, 54 (el 45,8% de los respondedores) estaban libres de crisis. El 23,4% (n = 43) refirió efectos adversos a los 12 meses, principalmente mareos (10,3%) e inestabilidad (3,3%). Después de la visita de los 12 meses, continuaba con lacosamida el 87,5% de los pacientes (n = 161). Conclusiones. La lacosamida ofrece un perfil de eficacia y seguridad muy favorable para pacientes con epilepsia focal refractaria. El elevado porcentaje de respondedores podría atribuirse a una población de epilépticos menos refractarios que en otros estudios de práctica clínica. Constituye una opción terapéutica atractiva para el tratamiento de epilepsias de inicio focal.

Experiencia clínica con lacosamida en Galicia: estudio GALACO / Clinical experience with lacosamide in Galicia: the GALACO study

Introducción. La lacosamida es un fármaco antiepiléptico bloqueante de los canales de sodio, autorizado en adolescentes y adultos como tratamiento coadyuvante en crisis de inicio focal. Objetivo. Analizar los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de la lacosamida en Galicia en su uso de acuerdo con la práctica clínica habitual. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo observacional en pacientes que iniciaron tratamiento con lacosamida entre enero de 2013 y junio de 2014 en 10 hospitales de Galicia. Se evaluó su eficacia y seguridad a los 3, 6 y 12 meses del inicio del tratamiento. Resultados. Se incluyeron 184 pacientes con edad media de 44,2 ± 17,4 años; el 56,5% (n = 104) eran varones. Conforman la población de eficacia 173 pacientes. El tiempo medio de evolución de la epilepsia fue de 18,8 ± 15,5 años. La frecuencia de crisis era de 2,5 ± 1,6 episodios/mes. A los 12 meses, el 68,2% de los pacientes (n = 118) presentaba una mejoría igual o superior al 50% (pacientes respondedores) y, de ellos, 54 (el 45,8% de los respondedores) estaban libres de crisis. El 23,4% (n = 43) refirió efectos adversos a los 12 meses, principalmente mareos (10,3%) e inestabilidad (3,3%). Después de la visita de los 12 meses, continuaba con lacosamida el 87,5% de los pacientes (n = 161). Conclusiones. La lacosamida ofrece un perfil de eficacia y seguridad muy favorable para pacientes con epilepsia focal refractaria. El elevado porcentaje de respondedores podría atribuirse a una población de epilépticos menos refractarios que en otros estudios de práctica clínica. Constituye una opción terapéutica atractiva para el tratamiento de epilepsias de inicio focal (AU)

Introduction. Lacosamide is a sodium channel blocker antiepileptic drug authorized as an adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adolescents and adults. Aim. To analyze the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in Galicia according to its use in daily clinical practice. Patients and methods. Retrospective observational study in patients who started treatment with lacosamide between January 2014 and June 2013 in 10 hospitals in Galicia, Spain. Its efficacy and safety at 3, 6 and 12 months after starting lacosamide was assessed. Results. We included 184 patients with a mean age of 44.2 ± 17.4 years old; 56.5% (n = 104) were male; 173 patients constituted the efficacy population. Mean duration of epilepsy was 18.8 ± 15.5 years. Seizure frequency was 2.5 ± 1.6 episodes/month. After 12 months, 68.2% of patients (n = 118) had ≥ 50% improvement (responders) and among them, 54 (45.8% of responder patients) were seizure free. Twenty-three percent (n = 43) suffered from adverse events after 12 months, being dizziness (10.3%) and instability (3.3%) the most frequently reported. After the 12 month visit, 87.5% of patients (n = 161) continued treatment with lacosamide. Conclusions. Lacosamide provides a very good efficacy and safety profile for patients with focal refractory epilepsy. High percentage of responders may be related to a less refractory population compared to other daily clinical practice studies. It constitutes an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of focal epilepsies (AU)